Skip to content

Tag: education

George Saunders Writing Education

Manner of Being

The New Yorker has a lovely essay by George Saunders, excerpted from a new book called A Manner of Being: Writers on Their Mentors, on his education as a writer:

For me, a light goes on: we are supposed to be—are required to be—interesting. We’re not only allowed to think about audience, we’d better. What we’re doing in writing is not all that different from what we’ve been doing all our lives, i.e., using our personalities as a way of coping with life. Writing is about charm, about finding and accessing and honing ones’ particular charms. To say that “a light goes on” is not quite right—it’s more like: a fixture gets installed. Only many years later… will the light go on.

Comments closed

Shape: A Short Film about Design

shape_still_webres_08_0

Shape is a lovely short film about design. Designed and directed by Johnny Kelly, and written by Scott Burnett, the film was commissioned by PIVOT Dublin to encourage young people to think about the world around them and where design fits in:

shape_still_webres_09_0

Kelly and Burnett recently talked to Creative Review about the project:

The duo looked at other recent design films, including Helvetica, Urbanized and Press Pause Play. They also found influence in films from the past, including Why Man Creates by Saul Bass, and “pretty much every educational/informational film made for IBM in the 60s and 70s”, says Burnett. In the end it was Charles and Ray Eames’ Powers of Ten that proved most useful. “Powers of Ten did offer the eventual breakthrough but conceptually rather than visually,” says Burnett. “Eventually the only thing that made sense was to zoom out and not make design the subject, but have it instead as the invisible catalyst in the story. Once we realised that then a lot of the early ideas found their way into the story which we just made nice and simple – a day in the life where the changes that are happening around us all the time are made visible.”

You can find out more about the project at SHAPEMAKECHANGE.

Comments closed

Bill Moggridge: The Design of Service and Education

Bill Moggridge, founder of design company IDEO and current director of the Smithonian Cooper-Hewitt National Design Museum in New York, discusses design and the Cooper-Hewitt’s collection:

Comments closed

Doyald Young, Logotype Designer

In this short film for Lynda.com, the late Doyald Young, legendary typographer, logotype designer, author and teacher, talks about his life and work:

(via Brain Pickings)

Comments closed

Something for the Weekend

A two-part interview with Chris Ware, author of Jimmy Corrigan: The Smartest Kid on Earth,  in The Comics Journal:

I just wanted to make a comic book that had a bit of density to it, and build on the cartoonists whose work I really deeply admire. I could list hundreds of cartoonists whose work I’ve stolen from, and I try to acknowledge them all, so I just wanted to make a book that didn’t lie, as much as I could.

Part One | Part Two.

And, designer Eric Heiman on Chris Ware for Eye Magazine:

Ware’s aims are literary, not pragmatic. But his work is still a subtle reminder that no amount of order we – as designers or otherwise – impose on our lives can ever eliminate the unexpected twists and turns they take. Quantitative data, no matter how clearly and beautifully presented, is not always the know-all, end-all answer, even in this age of Google analytics.

The Literarian — The new online journal for The Center for Fiction.

Science Fiction Lesson – Author Ursula K. Leguin talks about writing and science fiction with Owen Bennett Jones for the BBC World Service.

Split Personality — Author John Banville on author Benjamin Black in The Boston Globe:

I do a Benjamin Black in the spring and early summer. I hate summer so this is a wonderful excuse to sit in my room and pound away at a crime book. I write those quickly on the computer, in three to four months. What I want from Benjamin Black is spontaneity; John Banville writes in longhand with a fountain pen. I can’t do them both at the same time. Banville was never much interested in character, dialogue, and plot, and Black is entirely character and dialogue and plot. With the crime novels, it’s delightful to have protagonists I can revisit in book after book. It’s like having a fictitious family.

And finally…

A neat animated trailer for the documentary Waiting for “Superman”:

Comments closed

Let’s REDU

A video on the current state of education and REDU (Rethink / Reform / Rebuild Education), a campaign designed to expand and encourage conversation around education reform:

(via SwissMiss)

Comments closed

English

In spite of the hardcover’s beautiful jacket design (by Paola Ecchavaria), it was a citation in Nicholas Carr’s recent book The Shallows that finally got me to read Proust and The Squid by Maryanne Wolfe.

It is a fascinating if, at times, academic book that examines the history of written language and the corresponding development of our ‘reading brain’. In a chapter on reading development, Wolfe includes a charming, witty poem on the vagaries of English pronunciation that I wanted to share. Wolfe says the poem is anonymous, but I have subsequently seen it attributed to T.S. Watt. Please let me know if you have any further details…

I take it you already know
Of tough and bough and cough and dough.
Others may stumble but not you,
On hiccough, through, lough and through.
Well done! And now you wish, perhaps,
To learn of less familiar traps.

Beware of heard, a dreadful word
That looks like beard and sounds like bird,

And dead; it’s said like bed, not bead;
For goodness’s sake, don’t call it deed!
Watch out for meat and great and threat,
(They rhyme with suite and straight and debt).
A moth is not a moth in mother,
Nor both in bother, broth in brother,

And here is not a match for there,
Nor dear and fear for bear and pear,
And then there’s dose and rose and lose–
Just look them up–and goose and choose,
And cork and work and card and ward,
And font and front and word and sword,
And do and go and thwart and cart.
Come, come, I’ve hardly made a start.

A dreadful language? Man alive,
I’d mastered it when I was five.
And yet to read it, the more I tried,
I hadn’t learned it at fifty-five.

2 Comments

TELEPHONEME

Inspired by The Alphabet Conspiracy and other educational films from the 1950’s and 1960’s, TELEPHONEME is a hybrid live-action and animated short created by design collective MK12 about the science of the alphabet and sinister hidden messages carried by language:

MK12 also developed a special typeface for the film that can be downloaded from the TELEPHONEME website.

Comments closed

Education and Creativity

I thought I had posted about creativity and education expert Sir Ken Robinson before, but apparently I haven’t and so thank you to The Donut Project for reminding me to watch his TED talks again and mention them here…

In 2006 Robinson gave an inspiring presentation about creating an education system that nurtures creativity, and he returned to TED in 2010 to make the case for a shift away from standardized schools to fostering creativity and the natural talents of kids.

3 Comments

Waiting for “Superman”

After posting about Newsweek‘s report on education and declining creativity in America yesterday, this amazing animated infographic created by Buck for the documentary Waiting for “Superman” seems awfully relevant:

Made by David Oscar-winning filmmaker David Guggenheim (An Inconvenient Truth), Waiting for “Superman” is a documentary about the American public education system and how it is failing kids. You can watch the trailer here.

(via The Donut Project)

1 Comment

The Creativity Crisis

Newsweek reports on research that shows, for the first time ever, American creativity is declining:

With intelligence, there is a phenomenon called the Flynn effect—each generation, scores go up about 10 points. Enriched environments are making kids smarter. With creativity, a reverse trend has just been identified and is being reported for the first time here: American creativity scores are falling…

The potential consequences are sweeping. The necessity of human ingenuity is undisputed. A recent IBM poll of 1,500 CEOs identified creativity as the No. 1 “leadership competency” of the future. Yet it’s not just about sustaining our nation’s economic growth. All around us are matters of national and international importance that are crying out for creative solutions, from saving the Gulf of Mexico to bringing peace to Afghanistan to delivering health care. Such solutions emerge from a healthy marketplace of ideas, sustained by a populace constantly contributing original ideas and receptive to the ideas of others.

(via More Intelligent Life)

1 Comment

Educate or “Educate”?

I had an interesting discussion with author Jim Hanas (@jimhanas) on Twitter today about customers and education. It started with Jim’s comment (re-tweeted by Director of Digital Initiatives for Chelsea Green Publishing, Kate Rados / @KateRados):

“When you start trying to ‘educate’ your customers, it’s the beginning of the end for any industry.”

I disagreed, and said so. I believe education informs and liberates. Rarely is it a negative thing in life or business.

But as it turned out, in this context ‘educate’ meant something different to Jim than it did to me. For Jim, it was a sinister euphemism for scold, blame, bully, and punish. ‘Education’ was “code for ‘litigation.'”

If I understood him correctly, Jim was saying that to ‘educate’ our customers would be to repeat the mistakes of the music industry.

Needless to say, I don’t want to see publishers suing school children. For me, though, ‘educate’ means to inform, communicate, and engage — all things  publishers should do and not just with their books. To educate means, for example, an editor talking about a new acquisition, a production manager explaining why they used FSC approved paper, or a designer explaining how to use their tools.

Until now, we have assumed that nobody cared about this stuff. But the web has showed us that it can be endlessly fascinating, and, perhaps more pertinently, that an unwillingness to explain what we do ourselves creates a vacuum that will be filled by others who either have something to gain or who find our lack of transparency and engagement frustrating (looking at you Hugh McGuire!).

Ultimately, then, I don’t think Jim and I were in true disagreement. We just understood a word differently. Perhaps the lesson is that publishers need to educate, not “educate”?

4 Comments