Thanks for your comment Sara. But, needless to say I disagree. I think good design often seems like an obvious or simple solution after the fact. Surely that’s part of the brilliance?
Hank
Pierre Riviere is good, the other two are obviously designed by someone who hasn’t read the books. Needs some improvement. Screw? Seriously?
[…] RT @RhysTranter: New Vintage editions of Michel Foucault’s work: https://casualoptimist.com/?p=3226 […]
[…] Have I mentioned just how incredible Peter Mendelsund’s new Foucault covers are…? I did? OK. Just want to make […]
Faultless? They seem just a bit far too obvious.
Thanks for your comment Sara. But, needless to say I disagree. I think good design often seems like an obvious or simple solution after the fact. Surely that’s part of the brilliance?
Pierre Riviere is good, the other two are obviously designed by someone who hasn’t read the books. Needs some improvement. Screw? Seriously?